THORNTON v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY UNIFIED GOVERNMENT, et al
Filing
14
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint against the individual Defendants. Plaintiff's claims against the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County remain pending. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/13/2017. (CCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATHENS DIVISION
BRIAN KEITH THORNTON,
*
Plaintiff,
*
vs.
*
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-112 (CDL)
UNITED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS*
CLARKE COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al.,
*
Defendants.
*
O R D E R
Plaintiff Brian Keith Thornton, who is proceeding pro se,
asserts
employment
employer
and
discrimination
several
former
claims
against
supervisors
and
his
former
colleagues.
Thornton claims that he was discriminated against because of his
race
and
that
he
was
racial discrimination.
retaliated
against
for
complaining
of
Thornton brought this action under Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
Compl. § II, ECF No. 1.
The individual Defendants are Erin
Carlton,
Ward,
Hollis
Gary
Duck,
Lisa
Terry,
Glenn
Coleman,
Stephens.
Jeff
Michelle
Hale,
Jameson
Castleberry,
Goolsby,
and
Frank
These individual Defendants filed a motion to dismiss
(ECF No. 9).
“[R]elief under Title VII is available against
only the employer and not against individual employees whose
actions would constitute a violation of the Act,” and Thornton
did not allege any facts to show that the individual Defendants
meet the definition of “employer” under Title VII.
Collins,
441
Accordingly,
granted.
F.3d
the
931,
933
individual
(11th
Cir.
Defendants’
2006)
motion
Dearth v.
(per
to
curiam).
dismiss
is
Thornton’s claims against the Unified Government of
Athens-Clarke County remain pending.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of December, 2017.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?