THORNTON v. ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY UNIFIED GOVERNMENT, et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint against the individual Defendants. Plaintiff's claims against the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County remain pending. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/13/2017. (CCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION BRIAN KEITH THORNTON, * Plaintiff, * vs. * CASE NO. 3:17-CV-112 (CDL) UNITED GOVERNMENT OF ATHENS* CLARKE COUNTY, GEORGIA, et al., * Defendants. * O R D E R Plaintiff Brian Keith Thornton, who is proceeding pro se, asserts employment employer and discrimination several former claims against supervisors and his former colleagues. Thornton claims that he was discriminated against because of his race and that he was racial discrimination. retaliated against for complaining of Thornton brought this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Compl. § II, ECF No. 1. The individual Defendants are Erin Carlton, Ward, Hollis Gary Duck, Lisa Terry, Glenn Coleman, Stephens. Jeff Michelle Hale, Jameson Castleberry, Goolsby, and Frank These individual Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 9). “[R]elief under Title VII is available against only the employer and not against individual employees whose actions would constitute a violation of the Act,” and Thornton did not allege any facts to show that the individual Defendants meet the definition of “employer” under Title VII. Collins, 441 Accordingly, granted. F.3d the 931, 933 individual (11th Cir. Defendants’ 2006) motion Dearth v. (per to curiam). dismiss is Thornton’s claims against the Unified Government of Athens-Clarke County remain pending. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 13th day of December, 2017. S/Clay D. Land CLAY D. LAND CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?