VINSON v. CREATURE COMFORTS BREWING COMPANY LLC
PROTECTIVE ORDER Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 1/10/2022. (ggs)
Case 3:21-cv-00080-CAR Document 12 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
SHANNON C VINSON,
THE COURT ALERTS THE PARTIES THAT IT MODIFIED SECTION 3 AND
ADDED A FINAL SECTION TO THE PARTIES’ PROTECTIVE ORDER THAT
WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE AGREED ORDER SUBMITTED TO THE
Because confidential information, such as protected health information, may be produced
in discovery in this action, the parties have consented to entry of the following Order to facilitate
production and post-production treatment of such materials during the course of this litigation.
Because there is good cause for this order, the Court ORDERS, as follows:
Counsel for any party may designate any document, information contained in a
document, information revealed in an interrogatory response, or information revealed during a
deposition as confidential if counsel determines, in good faith, that such designation is necessary
to protect the interests of the client. Information and documents designated by a party as
confidential will be stamped “CONFIDENTIAL.” “Confidential” information or documents may
be referred to collectively as “Confidential Information.”
Case 3:21-cv-00080-CAR Document 12 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 5
Unless ordered by the Court, or otherwise provided for herein, the Confidential
Information disclosed will be held and used by the person receiving such information solely for
use in connection with the above-captioned action. The parties and their counsel agree that
Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to third parties unconnected to the litigation.
In the event a party challenges another party’s confidential designation, counsel shall
make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without
Court intervention, the Challenging Party must contact Nora Paul, Courtroom Deputy (478-7520725) to request a telephone conference with the Court before filing a motion challenging a
confidentiality designation. Nothing in this Protective Order constitutes an admission by any
party that Confidential Information disclosed in this case is relevant or admissible. Each party
specifically reserves the right to object to the use or admissibility of all Confidential Information
disclosed, in accordance with applicable law and Court rules.
Information or documents designated as “confidential” shall not be disclosed to any
The requesting party and counsel, including in-house counsel;
Employees of such counsel assigned to and necessary to assist in the litigation;
Consultants or experts assisting in the prosecution or defense of the matter, to the
extent deemed necessary by counsel;
Any person from whom testimony is taken or is to be taken in these actions, except
that such a person may only be shown that Confidential Information during and in preparation for
his/her testimony and may not retain the Confidential Information;
any witness identified by the parties in disclosures or discovery responses, and
The Court (including any clerk, stenographer, or other person having access to any
Confidential Information by virtue of his or her position with the Court) or the jury at trial or as
Case 3:21-cv-00080-CAR Document 12 Filed 01/10/22 Page 3 of 5
exhibits to motions.
Prior to disclosing or displaying the Confidential Information to any person, counsel
Inform the person of the confidential nature of the information or documents; and
Inform the person that this Court has enjoined the use of the information or documents
by him/her for any purpose other than this litigation and has enjoined the disclosure of that
information or documents to any other person.
The disclosure of a document or information without designating it as “Confidential”
shall not constitute a waiver of the right to designate such document or information as Confidential
Information, provided that the material is designated pursuant to the procedures set forth herein no
later than that latter of fourteen (14) days after the close of discovery or fourteen (14) days after
the document or information’s production. If so designated, the document or information shall
thenceforth be treated as Confidential Information subject to all the terms of this Stipulation and
Confidential Information may also be marked as “CONFIDENTIAL-TRADE
SECRET” if the producing party in good faith believes that the information constitutes a “trade
secret,” as defined by Section 1(4) of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, or by cases applying Georgia
law, O.C.G.A. § 10-1-761. All information subject to Confidential-Trade Secret treatment in
accordance with the terms of this Stipulation and Order that is filed with the Court, and any
pleadings, motions or other papers filed with the Court containing such information shall be filed
under seal to the extent permitted by the Court’s Procedures for Electronic Filing Under Seal in
Civil Cases. The parties agree to give the other party at least seven days’ notice of the party’s
intent to file any information subject to Confidential-Trade Secret treatment. It shall be the
obligation of the producing party of the documents to be filed with the Court to satisfy any such
Case 3:21-cv-00080-CAR Document 12 Filed 01/10/22 Page 4 of 5
precondition to filing such information under seal.
The parties agree to redact any information that is marked as Confidential Information
and that includes or constitutes: (1) personal identifying information, such as a Social Security
number; or (2) personal health information protected by the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act in accordance with this Court’s local rules for electronic filing.
At the final conclusion of litigation, the Confidential Information shall be promptly
(and in no event later than thirty (30) days after entry of final judgment no longer subject to further
appeal or dismissal of the case with prejudice) returned to the producing party or certified as
destroyed, except that the parties’ counsel shall be permitted to retain their working files on the
condition that those files will remain confidential.
10. Due to the large volume of electronic and hard copy data in the possession, custody,
or control of the parties and the numerous concerns regarding attorney-client privilege and work
product protection, the Court enters this “Clawback” Provision to expedite and facilitate the
production of electronic and hard copy data, information and documents, and to protect against
inadvertent disclosure of attorney-client privileged communications or work product materials.
The inadvertent disclosure or production of any information or document that is subject to an
objection on the basis of attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, will not be deemed
to waive a party’s claim to its privileged or protected nature or estop that party or the privilege
holder from designating the information or document as attorney-client privileged or subject to the
work product doctrine at a later date. Any party receiving any such information or document shall
return it upon request from the producing party. Upon receiving such a request as to specific
information or documents, the receiving party shall return the information or documents to the
producing party within five (5) business days, regardless of whether the receiving party agrees
with the claim of privilege and/or work-product protection. Disclosure of the information or
Case 3:21-cv-00080-CAR Document 12 Filed 01/10/22 Page 5 of 5
document by the other party prior to such later designation shall not be deemed a violation of the
provisions of this Order.
The foregoing is entirely without prejudice to the right of any party to apply to the Court
for any further Protective Order relating to specific confidential information; or to object to the
production of documents or information; or to apply to the Court for an order compelling
production of documents or information; or for modification of this Order. Either party may
enforce this Order, and any violation may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.
ADDED BY THE COURT:
The Court finds that good cause exists for the entry of this Order with the following
condition. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing Order, the Court
finds that it shall not apply to exclude evidence from public disclosure when that
evidence is relied upon in support of or in opposition to any motion or relevant in any
hearing or trial.
If a party seeks to rely upon any evidence covered by this protective order in support of
or in opposition to any motion or during any hearing or trial, that party shall notify the
opposing party at least 14 days prior to filing the motion and/or 14 days prior to the
hearing or trial. The opposing party shall have 7 days to respond objecting to the public
disclosure of the information, and the opposing party shall also file a motion to allow
the materials to be filed under seal, which shall state a compelling reason in support of
that motion. The Court will closely scrutinize any such requests at that time, with the
presumption that any evidence relied upon in a filed motion or in opposition to any
such motion or to be used in a hearing or trial shall be a public record.
Accordingly, when materials are to be used in the foregoing manner, a party will not be
allowed to file the materials under seal just because they are covered by this discovery
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2022.
s/ C. Ashley Royal
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?