MORRIS v. MCLAUGHLIN

Filing 7

ORDER to Amend Petition and ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by HERMAN MORRIS Ordered by US Mag Judge Stephen Hyles on 1/9/12. (lws)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
HERMAN MORRIS,

:
:
Petitioner,
:
:
VS.
:
:
Warden GREGORY McLAUGHLIN,
:
:
Respondent.
:
_____________________________________

NO. 4:11-CV-189-CDL-MSH
28 U.S.C. § 2254

ORDER

Petitioner HERMAN MORRIS, a prisoner at Macon State Prison, has filed a pro se petition
for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In compliance with this Court’s Order dated
December 14, 2011 (ECF No. 5), Petitioner has paid the $5.00 filing fee.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this
Order, the Petitioner shall amend his petition to include every unalleged possible constitutional error
or deprivation entitling him to federal habeas corpus relief, failing which the Petitioner will be
presumed to have deliberately waived his right to complain of any constitutional errors or
deprivations other than those set forth in his initial habeas petition. If amended, the Petitioner will
be presumed to have deliberately waived his right to complain of any constitutional errors or
deprivations other than those set forth in his initial and amended habeas petition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Respondent file an answer to the allegations of the
petition and any amendments within sixty (60) days after service of this order and in compliance
with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Either with the filing of the answer or
within fifteen (15) days after the answer is filed, the Respondent shall move for the petition to be
dismissed or shall explain in writing to the Court why the petition cannot be adjudicated by a motion

to dismiss.
No discovery shall be commenced by either party without the express permission of the
court. Unless and until the Petitioner demonstrates to this court that the state habeas court's
factfinding procedure was not adequate to afford a full and fair evidentiary hearing or that the state
habeas court did not afford the opportunity for a full, fair, and adequate hearing, this Court's
consideration of this habeas petition will be limited to an examination of the evidence and other
matters presented to the state trial, habeas, and appellate courts.
The Clerk of Court shall serve, by U.S. Mail, a copy of this Order, the Petition, and any
amendments thereto on the Respondent and on the Attorney General for the State of Georgia. The
Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner. Petitioner is
advised that his failure to keep the Clerk of the Court informed as to any change of address may
result in the dismissal of this action.
SO ORDERED, this 9th day of January, 2012.

S/STEPHEN HYLES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE