DAVIS v. JORDAN
Filing
2
ORDER remanding action to Circuit Court, Fourth Judicial Circuit, Duval County, Florida. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 06/05/2012. (CGC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
WARREN MARCUS DAVIS,
*
Plaintiff,
*
vs.
*
WAYNE T. JORDAN,
*
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-105
Defendant.
*
O R D E R
Plaintiff Warren Marcus Davis originally filed this action
in
Florida
state
court
asserting
contract
and
tort
Notice of Removal Attach. 2, Compl. ¶¶ 4-8, ECF No. 1-2.
claims.
He now
seeks to litigate these claims in federal court based upon the
Court’s federal question jurisdiction and has filed a “Motion to
Transfer,” which the Court construes as a notice of removal.
Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1; Notice of Removal Attach. 1, Civil
Cover Sheet Box II, ECF No. 1-1.
“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the
district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction,
may
be
district
removed
by
the
defendant
court
of
the
United
or
States
the
for
defendants,
the
to
the
district
and
division embracing the place where such action is pending.”
U.S.C. § 1441(a) (emphasis added).
28
The Court is unaware of any
provision that would permit a plaintiff such as Mr. Davis to
remove to federal court the same exact action that he has filed
in state court, particularly in light of the narrow construction
to be given to the removal statutes.
See Hamilton v. Aetna Life
& Cas. Co., 5 F.3d 642, 643 (2d Cir. 1993) (per curiam); see
also Burns v. Windsor Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 1092, 1095 (11th Cir.
1994).
Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s attempted removal of this
action to this Court is ineffective, and the Clerk is directed
to
remand
the
action
to
the
Circuit
Court,
Fourth
Judicial
Circuit, Duval County, Florida.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 5th day of June, 2012.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?