LEAK v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Filing
12
ORDER denying 10 Motion to Dismiss and granting Motion to Compel. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Clay D. Land on 11/06/2013. (CGC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
JAMES G. LEAK, JR.,
*
Plaintiff,
*
vs.
*
GENEAL MOTORS, LLC,
*
Defendant.
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-282 (CDL)
*
O R D E R
The Court entered a Scheduling and Discovery Order in this
action on February 15, 2013.
deadline
for
the
parties
That Order set a March 15, 2013
to
exchange
initial
disclosures.
Defendant represents that Plaintiff has not served his initial
disclosures.
In
addition,
Plaintiff
has
not
responded
to
Defendant’s interrogatories and requests for production, which
Defendant served on Plaintiff on March 12, 2013.
Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10), asking
the Court to dismiss this action for failure to prosecute and
because Plaintiff failed to satisfy his discovery obligations.
In
the
Plaintiff
declines
alternative,
to
to
Defendant
seeks
satisfy
his
discovery
dismiss
the
action
Defendant’s motion to compel.
at
an
order
obligations.
this
time
compelling
The
but
Court
grants
Plaintiff shall serve his initial
disclosures and fully respond to Defendant’s discovery requests
on or before November 27, 2013.
with
this
Order
by
Defendant
may
renew
Complaint
will
be
satisfying
its
motion
dismissed.
If Plaintiff does not comply
his
to
discovery
dismiss,
Defendant’s
obligations,
and
Plaintiff’s
expert
disclosure
deadline will remain stayed until after Plaintiff provides his
initial disclosures and full responses to Defendant’s discovery
requests.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of November, 2013.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?