HIGHTOWER v. FLETCHER et al
Filing
7
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 11/28/2012.(aaf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
MARY R. HIGHTOWER,
*
Plaintiff,
*
vs.
*
CASE NO. 4:12-CV-287 (CDL)
DR. SOYINI FLETCHER and VALLEY *
HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.,
*
Defendants.
*
O R D E R
Defendants removed this action to federal court contending
that the United States should be substituted as the Defendant
and that the action should then be dismissed for lack of subject
matter
jurisdiction.
Defendants
have
established
that
Plaintiff’s claims must be brought pursuant to the Federal Tort
Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq.
United States is substituted for the Defendants.
§
2679(b)(1)
(providing
that
the
United
States
Therefore, the
See 28 U.S.C.
is
the
only
evidence
that
proper FTCA defendant).
Moreover,
Plaintiff
has
the
United
failed
to
States
has
exhaust
her
presented
administrative
remedies
under the FTCA, and Plaintiff has not rebutted that evidence.
The FTCA requires a plaintiff to exhaust administrative remedies
as a jurisdictional prerequisite to the filing of an action
under the FTCA, and the plaintiff bears the burden of proof with
regard
to
Okeechobee
exhaustion.
Hosp.,
Accordingly,
283
28
F.3d
Defendant’s
U.S.C.
1232,
Motion
to
§
2675(a);
1236-37
Dismiss
(11th
(ECF
Barnett
Cir.
No.
v.
2002).
2)
is
granted, and this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of November, 2012.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?