HIGHTOWER v. FLETCHER et al

Filing 7

ORDER granting 2 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 11/28/2012.(aaf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION MARY R. HIGHTOWER, * Plaintiff, * vs. * CASE NO. 4:12-CV-287 (CDL) DR. SOYINI FLETCHER and VALLEY * HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., * Defendants. * O R D E R Defendants removed this action to federal court contending that the United States should be substituted as the Defendant and that the action should then be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants have established that Plaintiff’s claims must be brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. United States is substituted for the Defendants. § 2679(b)(1) (providing that the United States Therefore, the See 28 U.S.C. is the only evidence that proper FTCA defendant). Moreover, Plaintiff has the United failed to States has exhaust her presented administrative remedies under the FTCA, and Plaintiff has not rebutted that evidence. The FTCA requires a plaintiff to exhaust administrative remedies as a jurisdictional prerequisite to the filing of an action under the FTCA, and the plaintiff bears the burden of proof with regard to Okeechobee exhaustion. Hosp., Accordingly, 283 28 F.3d Defendant’s U.S.C. 1232, Motion to § 2675(a); 1236-37 Dismiss (11th (ECF Barnett Cir. No. v. 2002). 2) is granted, and this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of November, 2012. S/Clay D. Land CLAY D. LAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?