Weber v. Mentor Corporation et al
Filing
28
ORDER granting 27 Motion for Suggestion of Remand. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 12/22/2015. (CGC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
IN RE MENTOR OBTAPE
*
TRANSOBTURATOR SLING PRODUCTS
*
LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL Docket No. 2004
4:08-MD-2004 (CDL)
*
CASE NO. 4:14-CV-198 (Weber)
O R D E R
Presently
pending
before
the
Court
is
Defendant
Mentor
Worldwide LLC’s Motion for Suggestion of Remand to the United
States District Court for the District of Minnesota (ECF No. 27
in 4:14-cv-198). As discussed below, the motion is granted.
Plaintiff Glenda Weber alleged in her Complaint that she
sustained injuries caused by Mentor’s suburethral sling product,
ObTape
Transobturator
Tape,
which
multidistrict litigation proceeding.
No.
1-1
in
4:14-cv-198
transobturator
Litigation
sling”).
transferred
(alleging
The
is
issue
in
this
Compl. ¶¶ 1, 16, 19, ECF
injuries
Judicial
Weber’s
at
case
caused
Panel
to
on
this
by
“ObTape
Multidistrict
Court.
See
Conditional Transfer Order No. 111, ECF No. 3 in 4:14-cv-198.
During discovery, however, the parties learned that Weber
was not implanted with ObTape but with a different
Given
that
this
case
does
not
involve
ObTape,
it
product.
does
not
“involve questions of fact that are common to the actions” that
are
part
of
this
multidistrict
litigation
proceeding.
Conditional Transfer Order No. 111.
Therefore, the Court grants
Mentor’s motion for a suggestion of remand so that the Judicial
Panel
on
Multidistrict
Litigation
may
enter
an
order
transferring this case back to the transferor court, the United
States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of December, 2015.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?