BLACH v. DIAZ-VERSON
Filing
353
ORDER granting 340 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; granting 345 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; granting 351 Amended Motion for Disbursement of Funds. The motions are granted to the extent set forth in the Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 05/25/2018. (CCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
HAROLD BLACH,
*
Plaintiff,
*
ROBERT FREY, REGENCY REALTY,
LLC, and ROBERT FREY, TRUSTEE,
*
*
Third Party Claimants,
*
vs.
CASE NO. 4:15-MC-5 (CDL)
*
AFLAC, INC.,
*
Garnishee,
*
SAL DIAZ-VERSON,
*
Defendant.
*
O R D E R
Presently
pending
before
the
Court
is
the
Motion
for
Disbursement of Third Party Claimant Robert Frey as Trustee of
the Robert J. Frey Living Trust (ECF Nos. 340 & 351).
pending
before
the
Court
is
the
Motion
Plaintiff Harold Blach (ECF No. 345).
for
Also
Disbursement
of
Both motions are granted
to the extent set forth below.
The Court previously concluded that Frey as Trustee holds a
valid judgment against Frey’s former client, Defendant Sal-Diaz
Verson.
Order Granting Mots. for Disbursement (Mar. 14, 2018),
ECF No. 321.
The Court also concluded that Frey’s judgment is
superior to that of Plaintiff Harold Blach, another Diaz-Verson
judgment creditor.
The outstanding principal balance of Frey’s
judgment is now $14,813.21.1
Blach
filed
a
garnishment
against
Diaz-Verson’s
former
employer, Garnishee AFLAC, Inc., on March 14, 2018 (ECF No.
319).
In
response
to
that
garnishment,
$16,307.76 into the Court’s registry.
AFLAC
deposited
Frey as Trustee made a
third party claim to the entire $16,307.76 of garnished funds
and filed a motion for disbursement of the funds.
Blach objects
to the disbursement to the extent it seeks more than the amount
of the outstanding balance of Frey’s judgment.
Frey amended his
motion
disbursement
for
disbursement
and
now
only
seeks
of
principal in the amount of $14,813.21 plus $3.29 in interest per
day until payment is received, which Frey estimates will be
about
twenty-six
timeline
for
days.
past
Based
on
disbursements
the
in
Court’s
this
review
action,
of
the
the
Court
concurs with this estimate, and Frey’s motion for disbursement
(ECF Nos. 340 & 351) is granted.
disbursement
of
any
funds
remaining
1
Blach filed a motion for
in
the
Court’s
registry
The Court calculated Frey’s outstanding principal balance as
$33,663.37 as of April 27, 2018. Order Granting Mot. for Disbursement
(Apr. 27, 2018), ECF No. 340.
Frey contends that the outstanding
principal balance as of April 27, 2018 was actually $34,595.51 because
he did not receive the April 2, 2018 disbursement checks until April
24, 2018.
The Court accepts this argument and finds that the
outstanding principal balance as of April 27, 2018 was $34,595.51. On
May 18, 2018, the Clerk mailed Frey a check in accordance with the
Court’s April 27, 2018 Order of Disbursement. Frey received the check
for $20,005.25 on May 23, 2018. The outstanding principal balance of
his judgment is now $14,813.21.
2
following the final disbursement to Frey.
That motion (ECF No.
345) is granted.
The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Third
Party Claimant Robert Frey as Trustee of the Robert J. Frey
Living Trust with regard to $14,905.38 of the March 14, 2018
garnishment.
The Clerk is further instructed to enter judgment
in favor of Plaintiff Harold Blach with regard to the remaining
$1,402.38 of the March 14, 2018 garnishment.
Fourteen days from
the date of today’s Order, the Clerk shall disburse $14,905.38
to Frey as Trustee and $1,402.38 (plus any interest earned on
that amount while the funds were in the Court’s registry) to
Blach, unless any party files a notice of appeal relating to
today’s rulings before that date.
Any party seeking a stay
pending an appeal of today’s rulings shall file a motion with
citation to applicable authority with the notice of appeal.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 25th day of May, 2018.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?