BLACH v. DIAZ-VERSON
Filing
437
ORDER granting 432 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 03/07/2019 (CCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
HAROLD BLACH,
*
Plaintiff,
*
vs.
*
AFLAC, INC.,
*
Garnishee,
CASE NO. 4:15-MC-5 (CDL)
*
SAL DIAZ-VERSON,
*
Defendant.
*
O R D E R
Presently
pending
before
the
Court
is
Plaintiff
Harold
Blach’s Motion for Disbursement (ECF No. 432) of the $26,587.51
Garnishee AFLAC, Inc. deposited with the Court in response to the
November 20, 2018 and December 19, 2018 Writs of Garnishment.
There was no traverse to the Garnishee’s Answers, no third party
claim to the funds, and no objection to the motion.
Thus, the
motion is granted.
Based
on
Blach’s
representations
to
the
Court,
the
outstanding principal balance of Blach’s judgment against DiazVerson is more than $64,000.00.
The Court finds it unnecessary to
calculate the exact outstanding principal amount at this time.
To
keep the record clear, Blach’s future applications for writs of
garnishment and future motions for disbursement of funds shall
state the outstanding principal balance as of the date of the
filing, and Blach shall include a chart showing the entire balance
history of his judgment, including (1) costs, (2) accrual of
interest, and (3) how each disbursement was applied.
The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Blach
with regard to the November 20, 2018 and December 19, 2018 Writs
of Garnishment (ECF Nos. 407 & 412).
The Clerk shall disburse
$26,587.51, plus any interest earned on that amount while the funds
were in the Court’s registry, to Blach.
Given that there was no
objection to Blach’s motion for disbursement, the Court finds it
unnecessary to delay the disbursement, and the Clerk is authorized
to begin processing the disbursement immediately.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 7th day of March, 2019.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?