SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION LLC v. REAL ESTATE et al
Filing
44
ORDER granting 41 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 08/21/2017. (CCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
SABAL TRAIL TRANSMISSION, LLC,
Plaintiff,
*
*
vs.
REAL ESTATE et al.,
CASE NO.
4:16-cv-125 (Estate Of Willie
C. Walker, Jr. & Josephine
Walker, et al.)
*
*
Defendants.
*
O R D E R
Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Sabal Trail
Transmission, LLC’s summary judgment motion on the issue of just
compensation in this condemnation action.
As discussed below,
the Court grants Sabal Trail’s motion (ECF No. 41) and finds
that $382.00 is just compensation for the easements.
I.
Background
Plaintiff
Sabal
Trail
Transmission,
LLC
received
authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to
build an interstate natural gas pipeline.
Sabal Trail brought
this
Natural
condemnation
action
under
the
Gas
Act,
15 U.S.C. §§ 717-717z, seeking permanent and temporary easements
over one tract of land in Webster County, Georgia.
According to
Sabal Trail, the property was part of the Estate Of Willie C.
Walker,
Jr.
&
Josephine
Walker,
and
Sabal
Trail
named
as
Defendants in this action the Estate and individuals “known to
have or claim an interest in the Property from which easements
and associated rights are sought to be condemned.”
ECF No. 1.
Compl. ¶ 5,
Each Defendant was served personally with notice of
this action in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
71.1(d)(3)(A) or by publication in accordance with Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 71.1(d)(3)(B).
On June 10, 2016, the Court concluded that Sabal Trail was
entitled to possession of the easements it sought once it posted
a security bond.
Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC v. Estate, No.
4:16-CV-108, 2016 WL 3248367, at *12-*13, *18 (M.D. Ga. June 10,
2016), amended, No. 4:16-CV-108, 2016 WL 3251577 (M.D. Ga. June
10, 2016).
2016.
Pl.’s Notice of Posting Security Bonds, July 1, 2016, ECF
No. 35.
II.
Sabal Trail posted the security bond on July 1,
The only remaining issue is just compensation.
Discussion
Just
compensation
means
“the
fair
market
value
of
the
property on the date of the taking.” United States ex rel.TVA v.
1.72 Acres of Land in Tenn., 821 F.3d 742, 756 (6th Cir. 2016)
(citing United States v. Miller, 317 U.S. 369, 373–74 (1943)).
In a partial takings case like this one, just compensation “is
the difference in fair market value of the whole tract before
and after the taking.”
Id. (quoting United States ex rel. TVA
v. Easements and Rights–of–Way over 6 Acres of Land, 117 F.
App’x
422,
423
(6th
Cir.
2004));
2
accord
United
States
v.
33.92356
Acres
Of
Land,
585
F.3d
1,
9
(1st
Cir.
2009)
(collecting cases); United States v. 68.94 Acres of Land, More
or Less, Situate in Kent Cty., State of Del., 918 F.2d 389, 393
(3d Cir. 1990).
Generally, “market or comparable sales data
. . . is the best evidence of market value.”
1.72 Acres of Land
in Tenn., 821 F.3d at 757.
Sabal Trail argues that just compensation for the easements
in this case is $382.00.
J. 2, ECF No. 41-1.
Pl.’s Mem. in Supp. of Mot. for Summ.
Summary judgment may be granted only “if
the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any
material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter
of law.”
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).
In this condemnation case,
Defendants have the “burden to prove, by a preponderance of the
evidence,
what
amount
constitutes
just
compensation.”
Acres of Land in Tennessee, 821 F.3d at 756.
1.72
Defendants were
entitled to “present evidence on the amount of compensation to
be paid.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 71.1(e)(3).
None of the Defendants
responded to Sabal Trail’s summary judgment motion or presented
any evidence on what amount constitutes just compensation for
the easements.
Sabal
Trail
compensation:
the
did
present
expert
evidence
report
certified real property appraiser.
at 6-148.
of
J.
on
the
Carl
issue
Schultz,
of
just
Jr.,
a
Schultz Report, ECF No. 43
Schultz conducted an appraisal of the property and
3
concluded that the “before” value of the parcel as of July 1,
2016 was $89,400.00 and the “after” value, taking into account
the temporary and permanent easements, was $89,018.00.
9.
Id. at
Therefore, according to Schultz, just compensation for the
easements in this case is $382.00.
Id.
Again, Defendants did
not present any evidence on the issue of just compensation.
Based
on
the
evidence
before
it,
the
Court
concludes
that
$382.00 is just compensation for the easements in this case.
III. Payment of Compensation by Sabal Trail
Application for Obtaining Disbursement
and
Claimant’s
Within twenty-eight days of the date of this Order, Sabal
Trail shall pay into the registry of the Court $382.00 plus
prejudgment interest from the date of the taking (July 1, 2016),
which shall be calculated at a legal rate of interest of seven
percent per annum simple interest.
Once this amount is paid
into the registry of the Court, the security bond previously
posted by Sabal Trail shall be released.
Defendants may apply to the Court for distribution of the
award in accordance with their respective ownership interests.
Defendants may apply for a distribution of the award by sending
an application to the Clerk of Court, P.O. Box 124, Columbus GA
31902.
The Clerk shall docket each application electronically.
The application should include:
The applicant’s
any).
name,
address,
4
and
email
address
(if
The applicant’s claimed interest in the property and the
basis for that claim.
Proof of the applicant’s interest in the property.
Applications
must
be
postmarked
by
December
1,
2017.
Any
questions regarding the application process should be directed
to
the
Clerk’s
office
via
telephone
(columbus.ecf@gamd.uscourts.gov).
(706-649-7816)
or
email
If multiple applications are
received, the Court will schedule a hearing to determine how the
proceeds should be distributed.
IV.
Providing Notice to Defendants
None
of
the
Defendants
have
registered
for
electronic
filing through the Court’s electronic filing system and thus
will not receive electronic notice of this Order automatically.
The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order via U.S. mail on each
of the Defendants listed in Appendix A to this Order.
And,
within seven days of the date of this Order, Sabal Trail shall
mail a copy of this Order to any Defendant who is not listed in
Appendix A but whose address is known to Sabal Trail.
Sabal Trail shall also assist the Court with service of
this Order by publication on those Defendants whom Sabal Trail
represents
could
not
be
located
despite
a
diligent
Those Defendants are listed in Appendix B to this Order.
on
Sabal
Trail’s
prior
representations,
the
search.
Based
appropriate
newspaper for publication of this notice is The Stewart-Webster
5
Journal.
Within twenty-eight days of the date of this Order,
Sabal Trail shall:
1. Prepare
to the
notice
Federal
for the Clerk of Court’s signature a cover letter
publisher providing instructions for publishing the
in accordance with the requirements set forth in
Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1(d)(3)(B).1
2. Provide to the Clerk a check made out to the publisher for
the cost of publishing the notice; and
3. Prepare and submit to the Clerk a proposed notice to be
published.
Once
Sabal
Trail
provides
the
cover
letter,
check,
and
proposed notice to the Clerk, the Clerk shall submit these items
to the publisher and cause publication of the notice.
The Clerk
shall note on the docket when this task is complete.
Once
publication is complete, Sabal Trail shall obtain and submit to
the Court via CM/ECF a publisher’s affidavit demonstrating that
the notice was published.
V.
Legal Title to Easements
After Sabal Trail pays into the registry of the Court the
amount
stated
above
and
files
the
publisher’s
affidavit
demonstrating that notice of this Order was published, Sabal
Trail shall submit to the Court a proposed final order vesting
Sabal Trail with legal title to the permanent and temporary
easements.
1
The Court recognizes that Rule 71.1(d)(3)(B) provides the procedure
for service of an initial condemnation notice by publication.
The
Court finds that this procedure should be used to notify Defendants
who could not be located of the just compensation award and the
process for applying for a share of the award.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of August, 2017.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
7
APPENDIX A
The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order via U.S. mail on
each of the following Defendants:
Arthur Battle, Jr.
GDC ID: 0000972325
Jenkins Correctional Center
3404 Kent Farm Drive
Millen, GA 30442
Bryan Battle
102 Shadow Pond Road
Dublin, GA 31021
Bryan Battle
902 Treecrest Pkwy
Decatur GA 30035
Tanesha Battle
3108 Snapfinger Court
Decatur, GA 30034
Deborah Bolton
857 Glynn Oaks Drive
Clarkston, GA 30021
W.C., a minor c/o Regina Walker
457 Mount Vista Road
Stone Mountain, GA 30087
Jermaine Davis
3050 Garnet Way
Atlanta, GA 30349
Anthony Flannigan
301 Eastwyck Circle
Decatur, GA 30032
Darnell Flannigan
1402 Almont Drive
Atlanta, GA 30310
Gregory Flannigan
195 Wright Street
Lavonia, GA 30553
8
Teressa W. Johnson
195 Wright Street
Lavonia, GA 30553
Malik Silas
457 Mount Vista Road
Stone Mountain, GA 30087
Lee Owen Walker, Jr.
4237 Ridgetop Trail
Ellenwood, GA 30294
Paul Walker
115 Walden Walk Drive
Stone Mountain, GA 30088
Regina Walker
457 Mount Vista Road
Stone Mountain, GA 30087
Tommie Walker, II
1528 Brantley Court, NW
Atlanta, GA 30314
Tommie Walker, III
2421 Wingfield Drive
Austell, GA 30106
Tony Walker
115 Walden Walk Drive
Stone Mountain, GA 30088
Travis Walker
115 Walden Walk Drive
Stone Mountain, GA 30088
Joseph Yancey
1600 Van Vleck Avenue
Atlanta, GA 30316
9
APPENDX B
The following Defendants may be served with a copy of this
Order by publication:
Kelvin Battle
Iris Davis
Sebrina Davis
Senoia Davis
Estate Of Willie C. Walker, Jr. & Josephine Walker
Candace Flannigan
Sherrice Flannigan
Steven Jones
Angel Silas
Michael Silas
Leon Walker
Tomekia Zachary
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?