HARRISON v. CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS GEORGIA et al
Filing
40
FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT granting 38 Motion for final approval of settlement. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D. LAND on 10/11/2017 (tlf).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
CLEOPATRA HARRISON,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT
OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, et. al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 4:16-CV-329-CDL
FINAL APPROVAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Plaintiff
“Motion
for
has
Final
“Settlement”)
“Action”).
of
filed
a
motion
Approval”)
the
of
for
a
final
above-captioned
(the
settlement
proposed
approval
(the
class
action
(the
Cleopatra Harrison (“Plaintiff”), individually and
on behalf of the class of persons she seeks to represent (the
“Settlement
Class”
Defendants
Consolidated
(“Columbus”),
Michael
Michael
Lincoln
Defendants
defined
are
below),
filed
Government
Cielinski,
(collectively
collectively
John
this
of
Columbus,
Darr,
“Defendants”)
referred
to
action
as
Ricky
against
Georgia
Boren,
(Plaintiff
the
and
and
“Parties”).
Having fully considered the pending motion, the Court grants it
and approves the parties’ Class Action Settlement Agreement (the
“Agreement” or the “Settlement Agreement”), finding and ordering
as follows:
1.
Unless defined herein, all defined terms in this Final
Approval Order and Judgment shall have the respective meanings
set forth in the Agreement.
2.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of
the Action and over all parties to the Action, including all
Settlement Class Members.
3.
The
Court
preliminarily
approved
the
Settlement
Agreement and entered the Preliminary Approval Order dated April
26, 2017, and notice was given to all members of the Settlement
Class under the terms of the Preliminary Approval Order.
4.
The Court has read and considered the papers filed in
support of the Motion, including the Settlement Agreement and
the exhibits thereto, arguments and representations submitted on
behalf
of
the
Plaintiff,
Settlement
Class
Members,
and
Defendants. The Court has not received any objections from any
person
regarding
hearing
on
the
October
Settlement
11,
2017,
at
Agreement.
which
The
time
Court
the
held
parties
a
and
objecting Settlement Class Members were afforded the opportunity
to be heard in support of or in opposition to the Settlement
Agreement.
5.
Based
on
the
papers
filed
with
the
Court
and
the
presentations made to the Court at the hearing, the Court now
gives
final
approval
to
the
Settlement
and
finds
that
the
Settlement Agreement is fair, adequate, reasonable, and in the
best
interests
of
the
Settlement
2
Class.
This
finding
is
supported by, among other things, the complex legal and factual
posture of the Action, the fact that the Settlement Agreement is
the
result
of
arm’s
length
negotiations,
and
the
settlement
benefits being made available to Settlement Class Members.
6.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c), the Court
certifies, for settlement purposes only, the following class:
All persons who, at any time from October 5,
2014, through the date of the Settlement
Agreement, were assessed or paid a “victim
assessment fee” related to a proceeding in
the Columbus Recorder’s Court or any similar
fee for dismissal or non-prosecution of a
criminal action in the Columbus Recorder’s
Court, including but not limited to, any fees
assessed or paid by any persons pursuant to
former section 2.15.2(1) of the Columbus Code
of Ordinances.
7.
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g), Cleopatra
Harrison is hereby appointed as Class Representative and the
following are hereby appointed as Class Counsel:
Sarah Geraghty
Ryan Primerano
Southern Center for Human Rights
83 Poplar Street NW
Atlanta, GA 30303
Mark C. Post
Harp, Poydasheff, Post & Sowers, LLC
P.O. Box 1172
Columbus, GA 31902
8.
With
respect
to
the
Settlement
Class,
this
Court
finds, for settlement purposes only, that: (a) the Settlement
Class
is
so
numerous
that
joinder
3
of
all
members
is
impracticable; (b) there are questions of law or fact common to
the
Settlement
Class;
(c)
the
claims
of
the
Class
Representative, identified above, are typical of the claims of
the Settlement Class; (d) the Class Representative will fairly
and adequately protect the interests of the Settlement Class;
(e) the questions of law or fact common to the members of the
Settlement Class predominate over the questions affecting only
individual
members,
and
(f)
certification
of
the
Settlement
Class is superior to other available methods for the fair and
efficient
finds
adjudication
that:
(g)
limited
interest
issue;
(h)
the
in
the
of
the
members
controversy.
of
the
individually
Court
is
The
Court
further
Settlement
Class
have
prosecuting
satisfied
with
the
claims
the
a
at
Parties’
representations that they are unaware of any other litigation
commenced
regarding
the
claims
at
issue
by
members
of
the
Settlement Class; (i) it is desirable to concentrate the claims
in
this
forum;
and
(j)
it
is
unlikely
that
there
will
be
difficulties encountered in administering this Settlement.
9.
The Court has determined that the notice given to the
Settlement Class, in accordance with the Notice Plan in the
Settlement Agreement and the Preliminary Approval Order, fully
and accurately informed members of the Settlement Class of all
material elements of the Settlement and constituted the best
notice practicable under the circumstances, and fully satisfied
4
the requirements of due process, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
23, and all applicable law.
10.
All persons who made timely and valid requests for
exclusion are excluded from the Settlement Class and are not
bound by this Final Approval Order and Judgment.
11.
The
Agreement
Court
to
orders
perform
the
their
parties
to
obligations
the
Settlement
thereunder.
The
Settlement Agreement shall be deemed incorporated herein as if
explicitly set forth and shall have the full force of an order
of this Court.
12.
The Court orders Defendants to tender a check for the
Settlement Funds to Class Counsel in accordance with the terms
of the Settlement Agreement within 14 days of the date of this
Order.
Funds
The Court orders Class Counsel to distribute Settlement
to
members
of
the
Settlement
Class
within
14
days
of
receiving a check for the Settlement Funds from Defendants.
13.
Within
30
days
of
the
date
of
this
Order,
Class
Counsel shall provide the Court with written notice confirming
that the Settlement Funds were distributed, and shall move for
an order dismissing this case with prejudice.
14.
On
and
after
the
Effective
Date,
the
Releasing
Parties, and each of them, are forever barred and permanently
enjoined from directly, indirectly, representatively, or in any
other capacity filing, commencing, prosecuting, continuing, or
5
litigating
any
other
proceeding
against
any
of
the
Released
Parties in any jurisdiction based on or relating in any way to
the Released Claims, and the Releasing Parties, and each of
them, are forever barred and permanently enjoined from filing,
commencing,
or
prosecuting
any
lawsuit
individually
or
as
a
class action against any of the Released Parties (including by
seeking
to
allegations
amend
or
by
a
pending
seeking
complaint
class
to
certification
include
in
a
class
pending
action in any jurisdiction) based on or relating in any way to
the Released Claims.
15.
The
Court
further
adjudges
that
upon
the
Effective
Date, the above-described releases and the Settlement Agreement
will be binding on, and have res judicata and preclusive effect
in
all
pending
and
future
lawsuits
or
other
proceedings
maintained by or on behalf of the Releasing Parties, and each of
them.
16.
Without affecting the finality of this Final Approval
Order and Judgment in any way, the Court retains jurisdiction
over:
(a)
Agreement
implementation
until
the
final
and
enforcement
judgment
of
the
contemplated
Settlement
hereby
has
become effective and each and every act agreed to be performed
by the parties hereto pursuant to the Settlement Agreement has
been performed; (b) any other action necessary to conclude the
Settlement and to administer, effectuate, interpret and monitor
6
compliance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement; and
(c) all parties to this Action and Settlement Class Members for
the
purpose
of
implementing
and
enforcing
the
Settlement
Agreement, including the bar order set forth in paragraph 15
above.
17.
The Court approves payment of attorneys’ fees to Class
Counsel in the amount of $15,000. These amounts shall be paid in
accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The Court
finds
the
award
of
attorneys’
fees,
costs,
and
expenses
appropriate and reasonable and the Court notes that the class
notice specifically and clearly advised the class that Class
Counsel would seek the award.
18.
The Court approves the incentive fee payment of $5,000
for Cleopatra Harrison and specifically finds such amount to be
reasonable in light of the service performed by Plaintiff for
the Settlement Class. This amount shall be paid in accordance
with the terms of the Settlement Agreement.
19.
Neither this Final Approval Order and Judgment nor the
Settlement Agreement shall be construed or used as an admission
or concession by or against either Defendants or any of the
Released
Parties
of
any
fault,
omission,
liability,
or
wrongdoing, or the validity of any of the Released Claims. This
Final
Approval
validity
or
Order
and
invalidity
of
Judgment
any
7
is
claims
not
in
a
finding
this
of
Action
the
or
a
determination of any wrongdoing by
Defendants
or any of the
Released Parties. The final approval of the Settlement Agreement
does not constitute any opinion, position, or determination of
this Court, one way or the other, as to the merits of the claims
and
defenses
of
Plaintiff,
the
Settlement
Class
Members,
or
Defendants.
20.
To
the
extent
that
any
checks
to
Settlement
Class
Members expire and become null and void, and to the extent that
any undisbursed funds remain in the Settlement Fund for any
other reason, any remaining funds shall be distributed as a cy
pres award to the Columbus Alliance for Battered Women d/b/a
Hope Harbour.
21.
Any
objections
to
the
Settlement
Agreement
are
overruled and denied in all respects. The Court finds that no
just reason exists for delay in entering this Final Approval
Order and Judgment. Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby directed
forthwith to enter this Final Approval Order and Judgment.
SO ORDERED, this 11th day of October, 2017.
s/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND, CHIEF JUDGE
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?