BARRIENTOS et al v. CORECIVIC INC
Filing
212
ORDER granting 211 Motion to Modify. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 6/16/2022 (esl)
Case 4:18-cv-00070-CDL Document 212 Filed 06/16/22 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
COLUMBUS DIVISION
WILHEN HILL BARRIENTOS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00070-CDL
v.
CORECIVIC, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ DAUBERT
BRIEF AND EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL
The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Modify the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’
Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Daubert Brief and Exhibits Under Seal. As the Court
understands the motion, Plaintiffs do not intend to file a Daubert motion at the present time
because they do not intend to rely upon such a motion in support of any other pending or
anticipated motions or in response to any other pending or anticipated motions. Therefore, the
Court certainly will not require them to file a Daubert motion that is not necessary. However, if
such a motion becomes necessary, they must file it contemporaneous with any other motion or
response to a motion for which it is relied upon. And to the extent they seek to file a Daubert
motion to exclude trial testimony, any such motion shall be filed 14 days prior to the date of the
final pretrial conference. Any Daubert motion, along with supporting memorandum of law and
exhibits, that include confidential information may be filed in unredacted form under restricted
access, and versions that redact quotations from or references to information designated
CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY shall be filed in redacted form with
unrestricted access.
Signed: June 16, 2022.
Case 4:18-cv-00070-CDL Document 212 Filed 06/16/22 Page 2 of 2
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?