BARRIENTOS et al v. CORECIVIC INC

Filing 212

ORDER granting 211 Motion to Modify. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY D LAND on 6/16/2022 (esl)

Download PDF
Case 4:18-cv-00070-CDL Document 212 Filed 06/16/22 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COLUMBUS DIVISION WILHEN HILL BARRIENTOS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-00070-CDL v. CORECIVIC, INC., Defendant. ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO MODIFY ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ DAUBERT BRIEF AND EXHIBITS UNDER SEAL The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Modify the Court’s Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Daubert Brief and Exhibits Under Seal. As the Court understands the motion, Plaintiffs do not intend to file a Daubert motion at the present time because they do not intend to rely upon such a motion in support of any other pending or anticipated motions or in response to any other pending or anticipated motions. Therefore, the Court certainly will not require them to file a Daubert motion that is not necessary. However, if such a motion becomes necessary, they must file it contemporaneous with any other motion or response to a motion for which it is relied upon. And to the extent they seek to file a Daubert motion to exclude trial testimony, any such motion shall be filed 14 days prior to the date of the final pretrial conference. Any Daubert motion, along with supporting memorandum of law and exhibits, that include confidential information may be filed in unredacted form under restricted access, and versions that redact quotations from or references to information designated CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY shall be filed in redacted form with unrestricted access. Signed: June 16, 2022. Case 4:18-cv-00070-CDL Document 212 Filed 06/16/22 Page 2 of 2 S/Clay D. Land CLAY D. LAND United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?