Lathon v. McDade et al
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . Signed by Judge Claude W. Hicks Jr. on 3/17/06. (Hicks, Claude)
Lathon v. McDade et al
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION KARL DAVID LATHON, Plaintiff VS. Deputy Warden KATHY McDADE, et al., Defendants : : : : : : : : : :
NO. 5:06-CV-24 (DF)
PROCEEDINGS UNDER 42 U.S.C. §1983 BEFORE THE U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above-named plaintiff has requested that he be allowed to proceed in the above-stated matter in forma pauperis in bringing before the court his allegations of violations of various of his rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. Based upon the information provided by plaintiff and after consideration of the trust fund account statement from the facility wherein he is incarcerated, the undersigned finds it appropriate to permit plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis in the manner hereinafter set out. Therefore, in accordance with provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, IT IS ORDERED AND DIRECTED that the complaint and affidavit submitted by plaintiff shall be filed and that plaintiff shall be required to pay the $250.00 filing fee provided by law as follows: 30 days of the date of receipt of this order; or,
G Plaintiff shall pay an INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE in the amount of $______________ within
Payment of the initial partial filing fee is WAIVED by the court upon a finding that plaintiff does not have the financial ability to remit a partial filing fee at this time; IT IS FURTHER ORDER AND DIRECTED that: There shall be NO SERVICE on any defendant herein until further order of the court. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint.
SERVICE shall be made upon the defendant(s) as provided in a separate order this day entered.
SO ORDERED AND DIRECTED, this 17th day of MARCH, 2006.
CLAUDE W. HICKS, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?