Waller et al v. Fricks et al

Filing 3

ORDER denying 2 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Duross Fitzpatrick on 11/9/20006. (jab)

Download PDF
Waller et al v. Fricks et al Doc. 3 Case 5:06-cv-00201-CAR Document 3 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION RONALD WALLER and J O A N N W A L L E R , Plaintiffs, vs. ROBERT ABNEY FRICKS and BRANT FROST, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : O R D E R Before this Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (doc. 2). In their request, Plaintiffs state that their dual income is approximately $2,346.00 per month, and their expenses total approximately $705.00,1 excluding their federal student loan payments, which have been temporarily deferred. (Pls.' Mot., doc. 2, at 4.) Based on the information provided, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs have sufficient disposable income to pay the full filing fee of $350.00, even if Plaintiffs' monthly expenses increase in the near future due to studentloan payments. 5:06CV201 (DF) Plaintiffs' monthly deposit of $200.00 into their savings account was not included in this figure because it is not an "expense." 1 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-00201-CAR Document 3 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 2 of 2 Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (doc. 2) is hereby DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 9th day of November, 2006. /s/ Duross Fitzpatrick DUROSS FITZPATRICK, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DF/jab 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?