Jackson v. Stevens et al

Filing 9

ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION granting 7 Motion to Amend/Correct but RECOMMENDING that defendant JAMES DONALD be dismissed prior to service. Ordered by Judge Claude W. Hicks Jr. on 5/1/07. (Hicks, Claude)

Download PDF
Jackson v. Stevens et al Doc. 9 Case 5:07-cv-00136-HL-CWH Document 9 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION TONY JACKSON, Plaintiff VS. SERGEANT STEVENS, et al., Defendants PROCEEDINGS UNDER 42 U.S.C. §1983 BEFORE THE U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE NO. 5:07-CV-136 (HL) ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff TONY JACKSON herein has filed a motion to amend his complaint to include an additional defendant. Tab #7. Since this is Plaintiff's first proposed amendment and no defendant has filed any responsive pleading, Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint and add as a defendant JAMES DONALD is GRANTED as a matter of course. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a) However, the plaintiff's allegations against Donald are based solely on Donald's supervisory capacity, and actions cannot be brought pursuant to §1983 under the theory of respondeat superior. Geter v. Wille, 846 F.2d 1352 (11th Cir.1988). Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that JAMES DONALD be DISMISSED from this action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), the parties may serve and file written objections to this RECOMMENDATION with the district judge to whom this case is assigned WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. SO ORDERED AND RECOMMENDED this 1st day of MAY, 2007. CLAUDE W. HICKS, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?