Gordon v. Autumn Village 2 Assisted Living Facility Limited Liability Company et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting 36 Motion as to the substition of parties and denying as to extension of discovery; denying 42 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 10/7/2009. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION CHEREASE KINCAID, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF RAYMOND GORDON, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. AUTUMN VILLAGE 2 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Parties (Doc. 36) (the "Motion to Substitute"), Motion for a 90Day Extension of Discovery (Doc. 36) (the "Discovery Motion") and Motion to Stay the Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 42) (the "Motion to Stay"). The Court conducted a hearing by telephone on October 5, 2009, and another hearing by telephone on October 7, 2009. As the Court informed the parties at those hearings, the Court grants the following relief: The Plaintiff died on January 3, 2009. By an order of the Probate Court of Monroe County on August 10, 2009, Cherease Kincaid was authorized to serve as the Administratrix of the Plaintiff's estate. Pursuant Case No. 5:08-CV-348 (HL) to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25, the Court grants the Motion to Substitute Cherease Kincaid (Doc. 36), as the Administratrix of the Plaintiff's estate, for the Plaintiff. The parties informed the Court at the October 7 hearing that they are now prepared to go to trial on the next available trial calendar. Accordingly, the Discovery Motion (Doc. 36) is denied. The Court denies the Motion to Stay (Doc. 42), but Plaintiff may file her Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by Friday, October 9, 2009. SO ORDERED, this the 7th day of October, 2009. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, JUDGE jch 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?