Benning v. State of Georgia et al

Filing 68

ORDER FINDING AS MOOT 54 Motion to Stay; FINDING AS MOOT 54 Motion for Protective Order; FINDING AS MOOT 59 Amended Motion; FINDING AS MOOT 64 Amended Motion. The matter regarding the alleged confiscation of the Plaintiffs legal/religious bo oks has, with the Courts assistance, been resolved, and the Plaintiff was allowed to retain all of his personal, legal, and religious materials. (Doc. 61). To the extent the Plaintiffs motion seeks further relief from this Court, the motion is DENIED. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 6/17/2011. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION RALPH HARRISON BENNING, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) STATE OF GEORGIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-CV-435(MTT) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay, For Instructions, and For Protection. (Docs. 54, 59, and 64). The Plaintiff seeks a stay of all proceedings until his legal/religious books are returned and an order from the Court directing the Defendants to return the books, to refrain from any further harassment of the Plaintiff, not to transfer the Plaintiff to another prison, and not to remove the Plaintiff from his kosher vegan diet. The matter regarding the alleged confiscation of the Plaintiff’s legal/religious books has, with the Court’s assistance, been resolved, and the Plaintiff was allowed to retain all of his personal, legal, and religious materials. (Doc. 61). To the extent the Plaintiff’s motion seeks further relief from this Court, the motion is denied. The Plaintiff is advised to pursue those claims through the proper administrative channels. SO ORDERED, this 17th day of June, 2011. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?