Powell v. Geekie et al

Filing 72

ORDER granting 66 Motion to Quash; granting 68 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 9/10/2010. (nbp)

Download PDF
Powell et al v. Geekie et al Doc. 72 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA M A C O N DIVISION K IM M. POWELL and MICHAEL J. POWELL, P la in tiffs , v. A R Y N GRAVEL GORDON GEEKIE, N O R T H AMERICAN MIDWAY E N T E R T A IN M E N T -C A N A D A CO., and N O R T H AMERICAN MIDWAY E N T E R T A IN M E N T , LLC, Defendants. ORDER A telephone conference was held in this case on September 10, 2010. This O rd e r memorializes the rulings made by the Court during the conference. 1. P la in tiffs ' Motion to Protect Deposition of Dr. Jones (Doc. 66) is C iv il Action No. 5:09-CV-188(HL) granted. The deposition of Dr. Jones scheduled for September 10, 2010 at 12:00 p .m . will not take place. 2. D e fe n d a n ts ' Motion to Reconsider Court Order Denying Defendants' Motion in Limine to Strike the Plaintiffs' Expert, Darrin Marcus (Doc. 68) is granted. U n d e r the terms of the jointly proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order (Doc. 12) file d in this case, Plaintiffs were to identify their expert witnesses on or before S e p te m b e r 6, 2009. That deadline was never extended by the Court. As Mr. Marcus w a s not disclosed as a witness until February 2, 2010, his disclosure was untimely. A c c o rd in g ly , Mr. Marcus will not be allowed to testify at the trial of this case. Dockets.Justia.com 3. D e fe n d a n ts ' Motion for Leave of Court to Re-Designate the Defendants' Corporate Representative (Doc. 69) is granted. Mike Rinehart may serve as the D e fe n d a n ts ' corporate representative during the trial of this case. S O ORDERED, this the 10th day of September, 2010. s / Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE m bh 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?