Lamensdorf et al v. New York University et al

Filing 60

ORDER denying 45 Motion to Dismiss Party. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/23/2010. (nbp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION MICHAEL LAMENSDORF and KATHY LAMENSDORF, Individually As Parents of JOHN HUNT LAMENSDORF, Deceased, and As Personal Representative(s) of the Estate of JOHN HUNT LAMENSDORF, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. STEPHEN MICHAEL SIMON, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs' and Defendant Stephen Michael Simon's ("SMS") Renewed Joint Motion to Dismiss Claims Against Only Defendant SMS With Prejudice. (Doc. 45). For the following reasons, the Joint Motion is denied. On February 4, 2010, Plaintiffs and SMS filed their original motion to dismiss SMS as a result of a settlement agreement that was reached between them. (Doc. 13). On February 9, 2010, the Court denied the original motion to dismiss without prejudice because all of the Defendants Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-424 (HL) had not yet been served. (Doc. 15). After all Defendants were served and filed responsive pleadings, Plaintiffs and SMS filed the joint motion that is now before the Court. (Doc. 45). Defendants White, Cardona, Fung, Pen Pal Productions, Welin, and Stephen Robert Simon filed their responses to the joint motion to dismiss on June 11, 2010, in which they raised no objections to the dismissal of SMS. (Docs. 52, 54, 55). Defendant NES Rentals, however, opposes the motion, and has filed a cross-claim (Doc. 57) against SMS alleging that as a direct and proximate result of the breaches of duty owed by SMS, NES Rentals is entitled to full indemnity or contribution from SMS if it is determined that NES Rentals is found liable. In light of the cross-claim against SMS, the Court finds that he should remain a party to the case at this time. Accordingly, the Renewed Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 45) is denied. SO ORDERED, this the 23rd day of June, 2010. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE SPO 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?