Jackson v. Burnside et al
Filing
92
ORDER ADOPTING 89 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 83 Motion for Summary Judgment. Case is dismissed. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 3/6/2013. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
MARK WAYNE JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. EDWARD H. BURNSIDE and
CALVIN RAMSEY,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-73 (MTT)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 89). The Magistrate Judge, having
reviewed the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 83), recommends
granting the Motion because the Plaintiff failed to create a genuine issue of material fact
with regard to his claims against the Defendants. The Plaintiff filed an objection to the
Recommendation. (Doc. 91). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has
thoroughly considered the Objection and has made a de novo determination of the
portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects.
The Plaintiff argues that the extensive medical records submitted by the
Defendants are really those of another inmate with the same name and medical issues
as the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff points to one document out of over 550 pages of medical
records to show that the records are not his.1 However, with the exception of this one
1
While the page cited does have a different inmate ID number and birthdate than the Plaintiff’s,
the document also has “error wrong Mark” written on it. (Doc. 83-8 at 17).
page, the medical records appear to be the Plaintiff’s, and the Plaintiff does not point to
any other discrepancies.
The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of
the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this
Court. Accordingly, the Motion is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED, this 6th day of March, 2013.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?