Dollar v. Carter et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 9/9/2010. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION WESLEY EUGENE DOLLAR, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ALAN CARTER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:10-CV-208(MTT) ORDER This case is before the Court on the Recommendation (Doc. 11) of United States Magistrate Judge Claude W. Hicks, Jr. on the Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7) (the "Motion"). The Magistrate Judge, having reviewed the Plaintiff's motion pursuant to the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) & (b), recommends denying the Plaintiff's Motion because the Plaintiff has not shown that he has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 16). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered Petitioner's Objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which Petitioner objects. The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 7) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this the 9th day of September, 2010. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT jch

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?