United States of America v. Funds 20,000.00 in United States et al

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING 22 Motion to Strike; GRANTING 22 Motion for Forfeiture of Property. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 1/3/2012. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v
$20,000.00 IN UNITED STATES
FUNDS, et al.,
Defendant Property,

ISAAC DECENA-GONZALEZ,
Claimant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CASE NO. 5:10-CV-381 (MTT)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AND
ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike, the Supplemental Rules for
Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, and the record of this case, the
Court finds that good cause exists to grant Plaintiff’s motion.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Claim and Answer of Claimant
Isaac Decena-Gonzalez (Docs. 6 and 10) shall be stricken from this case.
The responsive pleadings of the Claimant having been stricken, the Court hereby
makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
1.

This Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and

1355, and venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1395.
2.

Pursuant to a Warrant of Arrest in Rem this Court issued on October 15,

2010, the U.S. Marshals Service for the Middle District of Georgia arrested and seized the
Defendant Property on October 18, 2010 and October 22, 2010.

3.

The United States has furnished due and legal notice of these proceedings

as required by law. The United States perfected service of process of this action on
Claimant Isaac Decena-Gonzalez, and other potential claimants.
4.

The United States published notice of this action on an official government

website, www.forfeiture.gov for at least thirty (30) consecutive days, beginning on October
26, 2010, as required by Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or
Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.
5.

Claimant filed a timely Claim and Answer in these proceedings, asserting his

interest in the Defendant Property described as $20,000.00 in United States Funds, and
One 2000 Volkswagen Jetta GLX, VIN: 3VWTE29M3YM056147, but those pleadings have
now been stricken.
6.

Plaintiff sent Special Interrogatories to the Claimant, through his counsel of

record, which were received on April 18, 2011.
7.

The due date for Claimant’s responses to Plaintiff’s Special Interrogatories

was May 9, 2011, but Claimant failed to respond.
8.

This Court entered an Order on August 8, 2011 allowing Claimant’s counsel

to withdraw after having reviewed and considered the filed request.
9.

Upon the filing of a motion requesting an extension of time to complete

discovery by the Plaintiff, this Court entered an Order extending the time up to December
27, 2011.
10.

The Plaintiff has made numerous attempts to locate and serve the Claimant

again with its Special Interrogatories, but has been unsuccessful in locating Mr. DecenaGonzalez.
2

11.

As of today’s date, no other person or entity has filed a claim and answer in

this action and the time for filing a timely claim and answer has expired.
12.

There is sufficient evidence to warrant a conclusion, by a preponderance of

evidence standard, that Defendant Property is subject to forfeiture in accordance with 21
U.S.C. § 881(a)(6).
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT:
1.

All right, title, and interest in the Defendant Property is hereby forfeited to and

vested in the United States, which shall have clear title to this property and may warrant
good title to any subsequent transferee.
2.

The United States Attorney General or his authorized designee shall dispose

of this property in accordance with the law.
3.

No parties shall be entitled to costs, including any costs under 28 U.S.C. §

2412, nor shall the person or persons who made the seizure of the Defendant Property, nor
any attorney, agent, or employee of the United States, be liable to suit or judgment on
account of the seizure of the Defendant Property or prosecution of the instant forfeiture
action, there being reasonable cause shown for the seizure.
3rd
January
SO ORDERED, this _____day of ___________________, 2012

S/Marc T. Treadwell

MARC T. TREADWELL , JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

PREPARED BY:
s/ DANIAL E. BENNETT
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
GEORGIA STATE BAR NO. 052683
3