Moss v. Walker et al
Filing
5
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing this action without prejudice. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 4/13/11. (lap)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
HENRY MARVIN MOSS,
:
:
Plaintiff
:
:
VS.
:
:
Warden VICTOR WALKER, et al.,
:
:
Defendants
:
____________________________________:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-125 (CAR)
ORDER
Plaintiff HENRY MARVIN MOSS, presently incarcerated at Baldwin State Prison in
Hardwick, Georgia, has filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiff has
not paid the required $350.00 filing fee; nor has he sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
However, because plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, the Court will assume that he wishes to
proceed in forma pauperis.
The Prison Litigation Reform Act provides as follows:
In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in
a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3
or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility,
brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was
dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under
imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
The Eleventh Circuit has concluded that §1915(g) does not violate the following: The
doctrine of separation of powers; an inmate’s right of access to the courts; an inmates right to due
process of law; or an inmates right to equal protection. Accordingly, the Eleventh Circuit has upheld
the constitutionality of §1915(g). Rivera v. Allin, 144 F.3d 719, 721-27 (11th Cir. 1998), abrogated
on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007).
A review of court records on the U.S. District Web PACER Docket Report reveals that
plaintiff has filed numerous civil rights cases with federal courts while incarcerated. At present, at
least six of these cases and/or appeals have been dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915
prior to the filing of this lawsuit: Moss v. Miller, 1:98-cv-66 (WLS) (M.D. Ga.) (appeal dismissed
as frivolous); Moss v. Superior Ct. of Dougherty Co., 1:95-cv-222 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Dec. 8, 1995)
(initial filing dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d))1; Moss v. Kelley, 1:95-cv-197
(WLS) (M.D. Ga. Oct 31, 1995) (initial filing dismissed as frivolous); Moss v. State of Georgia,
1:94-cv-3360-FMH (N.D. Ga. Feb. 16, 1995) (initial filing dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(d)); Moss v. Priddy, 1:94-cv-9 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Jan. 28, 1994) (initial filing
dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)); and Moss v. Williams, 1:94-cv-8 (WLS)
(M.D. Ga. Jan. 31, 1994) (initial filing dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)).
Because plaintiff has had at least six prior dismissals, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis
in the instant case unless he can show that he qualifies for the “imminent danger of serious physical
injury” exception of § 1915(g). Plaintiff has not made such a showing.
Therefore, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED and the instant action
is DISMISSED without prejudice. If plaintiff wishes to bring a new civil rights action against these
defendants, he may do so by submitting new complaint forms and the entire $350.00 filing fee at
the time of filing the complaint.2
SO ORDERED, this 13th day of April, 2011.
S/ C. Ashley Royal
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
lnb
1
Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), as then in effect, a court could dismiss a case if the allegation of
poverty was untrue or if the action was frivolous or malicious. Former 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) is now
codified at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A , which additionally allow a court to dismiss an action that
fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
2
In Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2002), the Eleventh Circuit held that a prisoner
cannot simply pay the filing fee after being denied in forma pauperis status, he must pay the filing fee at
the time he initiates the suit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?