Baez v. Rogers

Filing 48

ORDER denying 29 Motion to Procure Order to Prevent Present and Future Harm; adopting 44 Report and Recommendations; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 6/20/2012. (nbp)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ROBERTO BAEZ, Plaintiff, Civil Action 5:11-CV-190 (HL) v. MICHAEL ROGERS, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles (Doc. 44), entered on May 3, 2012, in which he recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) be granted and Plaintiff’s Motion to Procure an Order to Prevent Present and Future Harm (Doc. 29) be denied. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of the Recommendation, and has carefully considered Plaintiff’s objection. The Court overrules the objection and accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is granted. Plaintiff’s Motion to Procure an Order to Prevent Present and Future Harm (Doc. 29) is denied. SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of June, 2012. s/ Hugh Lawson HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE mbh

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?