COONROD v. ASTRUE

Filing 15

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; adopting Report and Recommendations re 14 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 04/04/12 (ans)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION STEVEN COONROD, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of : Social Security, : : Defendant. : ____________________________________: Case No. 5:11-cv-363 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle, filed March 6, 2012. (Doc. 14). It is recommended that Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 13) be granted and Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) be dismissed. (Doc. 14 at 1). The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days1 from the date of its service to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id.). The period for objections expired on Friday, March 23, 2012, and no objections have been filed to date. (See generally Docket). Upon full review and consideration of the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, 1 The Parties were given an additional three days because service was made by mail. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (adding three days to specified period within which a party may act if service is made under Rule 5(b)(2)(C) by mailing process to a party’s last known address). 1 Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 14) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED, this 4th day of April, 2012. /s/ W. Louis Sands THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?