MILLEDGE v. OWENS et al
Filing
73
ORDER granting 30 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 44 Motion to Provide Copy; granting 49 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; finding as moot 66 Motion to Amend; adopting Report and Recommendations re 70 Report and Recommendations; finding as moot 72 Motion to Amend/Correct. Ordered by Judge Hugh Lawson on 2/27/2013. (nbp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
WILLIE JAMES MILLEDGE,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 5:11-CV-452 (HL)
v.
BRIAN OWENS, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This case is before the Court on a Recommendation from United States
Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle (Doc. 70). Plaintiff has filed an objection to
the Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of the
Recommendation, and upon review, accepts and adopts the recommendation.
Accordingly, the Court orders as follows:
1.
The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Owens, McLaughlin,
Sanford, Ramsay, Howerton, and Crickmar (Doc. 30) is granted.
2.
The Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Supplemental Complaint filed by
Defendants Sanford and Ramsay (Doc. 49) is granted.
3.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Provide a Copy of the Requested Medical
Record or a Summary (Doc. 44) is denied as moot.
4.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amendment (Doc. 66) is denied as moot.
5.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Relation Back of Amendment under Rule 15(c)
and 17(a) (Doc. 72) is denied as moot.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of February, 2013.
s/ Hugh Lawson
HUGH LAWSON, SENIOR JUDGE
mbh
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?