DAVIS v. BANTA et al

Filing 72

ORDER DENYING 66 Motion to alter or amend the judgment; DENYING 69 Motion for Extension of Time; and DENYING 71 Motion to Compel. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/10/2014. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION PATRICK DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. BARCLAY BANTA, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-146 (MTT) ORDER On March 5, 2014, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 64). The next day, March 6, the Plaintiff filed an untimely motion for an extension of time (Doc. 66) to object to the Recommendation (Doc. 63). Because judgment (Doc. 65) had been previously entered that same day, the Court construed the Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time as a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The Court then gave the Plaintiff until April 9, 2014 to file a brief in support of his motion. The Plaintiff has not filed any such brief. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the judgment (Doc. 66) is DENIED. The Plaintiff’s subsequently filed motion for extension of time (Doc. 69) and motion to compel legal documents (Doc. 71) are also DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 10th day of April, 2014. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?