DAVIS v. BANTA et al

Filing 72

ORDER DENYING 66 Motion to alter or amend the judgment; DENYING 69 Motion for Extension of Time; and DENYING 71 Motion to Compel. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/10/2014. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
PATRICK DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
BARCLAY BANTA, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-146 (MTT)

ORDER
On March 5, 2014, the Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation
granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 64). The next day,
March 6, the Plaintiff filed an untimely motion for an extension of time (Doc. 66) to
object to the Recommendation (Doc. 63). Because judgment (Doc. 65) had been
previously entered that same day, the Court construed the Plaintiff’s motion for an
extension of time as a motion to alter or amend the judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). The Court then gave the Plaintiff until April 9, 2014 to file a brief in support of his
motion. The Plaintiff has not filed any such brief.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend the judgment (Doc. 66) is
DENIED. The Plaintiff’s subsequently filed motion for extension of time (Doc. 69) and
motion to compel legal documents (Doc. 71) are also DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 10th day of April, 2014.

S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT