EBERHART et al v. OUBRE et al
ORDER DENYING 8 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 6/20/2012. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MICHAEL DION EBERHART;
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN,
Warden SHEILA OUBRE, et al.,
Plaintiff MICHAEL DION EBERHART, has filed a motion to proceed in forma
pauperis on appeal (ECF No. 8) from the Court=s May 18, 2012 Order dismissing his
complaint. (ECF No. 4). In the Court=s best judgment, an appeal from that Order cannot
be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3).
Having been carefully considered, Plaintiff=s motion to proceed in forma pauperis
on appeal is hereby DENIED.
If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his appeal, he must pay the entire $455.00
appellate filing fee. Because Plaintiff has stated that he cannot pay the $455.00
immediately, he must pay using the partial payment plan described under 28 U.S.C.
' 1915(b). Pursuant to '1915(b), the prison account custodian where Plaintiff is
incarcerated shall cause to be remitted to the Clerk of this Court monthly payments of
20% of the preceding month=s income credited to Plaintiff=s account until the $455.00
appellate filing fee has been paid in full. Twenty percent of any deposits into the
prisoner=s account shall be withheld by the prison account custodian who, on a monthly
basis, shall forward the amount withheld from the prisoner=s account to the Clerk of this
Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the total filing fee of
$455.00 has been paid. Checks should be made payable to AClerk, U.S. District Court.@
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order to the custodian of the
prison in which Plaintiff is incarcerated.
SO ORDERED AND DIRECTED this 20th day of June, 2012.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?