ORTIZ v. BURNSIDE et al

Filing 18

ORDER adopting 10 Report and Recommendation and Denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 11/30/12 (lap)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
JUAN CARLOS ORTIZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
EDWARD HALE BURNSIDE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-190(MTT)

ORDER
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s Recommendation
(Doc. 10) on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 2). The Magistrate
Judge recommends denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction because, at
this time, the facts have not been sufficiently developed to establish the elements
necessary to grant the preliminary injunction. (Doc. 10 at 3). The Plaintiff has objected
to the Recommendation. (Doc. 15).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has thoroughly considered the
Plaintiff’s Objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the
Recommendation to which Plaintiff objects. The Court accepts and adopts the findings,
conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge in the Recommendation.
(Doc. 10).
Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED.

SO ORDERED, this 30th day of November, 2012.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT