TUCKER v. PEACOCK et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations. The Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief against Defendant Searcy is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Upson County, Sheriff Peacock, Mayor Kilgore, Dr. Busbee, and the Board of County Commissioners are dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiff's damages claim against Defendant Searcy will go forward. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 9/24/2012. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ROBERT TUCKER, III, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff PEACOCK, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-244 (MTT) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 8). The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissal of the Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief against Defendant Captain Ralph Searcy.1 Pursuant to a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A review, the Magistrate Judge also recommends dismissing defendants Upson County, Sheriff Peacock, Mayor Kilgore, Dr. Busbee, and the Board of County Commissioners. The Plaintiff has not filed an objection to this Recommendation.2 The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief against Defendant Searcy is dismissed without prejudice. Defendants Upson                                                                1 This claim was dismissed as moot because Defendant Searcy is an official at Upson County Jail, and the Plaintiff is no longer incarcerated there. However, the Plaintiff’s damages claim against Defendant Searcy will go forward as ordered by the Magistrate Judge. 2 During the objection period, the Plaintiff did file a motion to amend his complaint. (Doc. 11). However, this is a matter for the Magistrate Judge to address and is not construed by this Court as an objection.    County, Sheriff Peacock, Mayor Kilgore, Dr. Busbee, and the Board of County Commissioners are dismissed without prejudice. The Plaintiff’s damages claim against Defendant Searcy will go forward as ordered by the Magistrate Judge. SO ORDERED, this 24th day of September, 2012. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT     -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?