TUCKER v. PEACOCK et al

Filing 35

ORDER ADOPTING 30 Report and Recommendations. The claims in the Plaintiff's amended Complaint against Sheriff Peacock, Major Kilgore, Dr. Busbee, and the County Commissioner of Upson County are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915A(b)(1). Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 5/22/2013. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ROBERT TUCKER, III, Plaintiff, v. RALPH SEARCY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-244 (MTT) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 30). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Doc. 11) his Complaint to reassert claims against former Defendants Sheriff Peacock, Major Kilgore, Dr. Busbee and the County Commissioner of Upson County.1 However, following a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A screening of the amended Complaint, Judge Hyles recommends dismissing these new claims. The Plaintiff has not filed an objection to this Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The claims in the Plaintiff’s amended                                                                1 The Court in a previous Order (Doc. 12) adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Doc. 8) to dismiss claims against these parties following a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A review. However, during the objection period following that Recommendation, the Plaintiff filed a Motion to Amend (Doc. 11) his Complaint. The Court left that motion for the Magistrate Judge to address, which he has done by way of his Recommendation. Complaint against Sheriff Peacock, Major Kilgore, Dr. Busbee, and the County Commissioner of Upson County are dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915A(b)(1). SO ORDERED, this 22nd day of May, 2013. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?