TUCKER v. PEACOCK et al

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING 42 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 31 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/25/2014. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION

ROBERT TUCKER, III,
Plaintiff,
v.
RALPH SEARCY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-244 (MTT)

ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 42). The Magistrate Judge recommends
granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 31) because the Plaintiff
cannot show the Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his medical needs. The
Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 43).
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1), the Court has also considered the Plaintiff’s objection and made a de novo
determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects.
The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED, this 25th day of March, 2014.

S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT