ABANIFI v. OUBRE et al

Filing 39

ORDER ADOPTING 35 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 26 Motion to Dismiss. 1 Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/28/2014. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION EMEKA MICHAEL ABANIFI, JR., Plaintiff, v. Warden SHEILA OUBRE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-421 (MTT) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 35). The Magistrate Judge, having reviewed the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 26), recommends granting the motion because the Plaintiff failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) on either of his claims. The Plaintiff filed an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 37). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff’s objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Plaintiff fails to respond to the recommendation that his claims be dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies and, instead, states that “[i]t is clear that [his] rights were violated.” (Doc. 37 at 1). The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Defendants’ motion is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. SO ORDERED, this the 28th day of January, 2014. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?