AURORA LOAN SERVICES v. LAWSON
Filing
3
ORDER REMANDING case to Superior Court of Putnam County. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 4/11/2013. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
AURORA LOAN SERVICES,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
WANDA E. LAWSON
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________________ )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-463 (MTT)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Notice of Removal. (Doc. 1).
As far as the Court is able to determine, a foreclosure action was filed against the
Defendant by Aurora Loan Services, LLC (“ALS”) in the Superior Court of Putnam
County. The superior court entered an order on November 8, 2012, against the
Defendant granting a writ of possession to ALS.
This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over ALS’s state law
foreclosure action. Although the Defendant asserts that ALS has violated 15 U.S.C.
§ 1692 and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, federal jurisdiction
is based upon the face of the Plaintiff’s complaint, and “a counterclaim . . . cannot serve
as the basis for ‘arising under’ jurisdiction.” Holmes Grp., Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation
Sys., Inc., 535 U.S. 826, 831 (2002). Moreover, the case was not properly removed
because the Defendant, presumably a resident of Georgia, cannot remove a Georgia
state court case in which she is the defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b).
Accordingly, this case is not properly before the Court, and this action is
REMANDED.
SO ORDERED, this the 11th day of April, 2013.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?