VERDI v. WILKINSON COUNTY GEORGIA et al

Filing 19

ORDER DENYING 17 Motion to Amend/Restate; DENYING 18 Motion for Review. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 3/11/2013. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
BILLIE JEAN VERDI,
Petitioner,
v.
WILKINSON COUNTY, GEORGIA,
JOHN W. ROBERTS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-CV-488(MTT)

ORDER
Before the Court are Petitioner Billie Jean Verdi’s Motion Before the Court and
Motion for Review of Civil Action. (Docs. 17 and 18). The Court’s January 9, 2013,
Order dismissed the Petitioner’s Petition without prejudice for failing “to state an
arguable basis in law or fact for the relief it seeks.” (Doc. 8). The Petitioner moved to
restate on January 17, 2013 (Doc. 11), and the Court found that the Petitioner’s Motion
to Restate did not change the Court’s previous analysis of her Petition (Doc. 12). The
Petitioner moved again to amend/restate her civil case (Doc. 13) and for reconsideration
of the Court’s Order dismissing her case (Doc. 14). The Court denied both motions.
(Doc. 15).
The Petitioner now moves the Court again to amend her Petition.1 (Doc. 17).
The Petitioner also requests that the Court review the civil action and reinstate the
Petition. (Doc. 18). Both Motions are DENIED. The Petitioner still fails the state a

1
Though styled as a “Motion Before the Court,” the contents of the Motion request that the
Court permit the Petitioner to amend her Petition. Therefore, the Court will construe the Motion
as a third Motion to Amend/Restate.

legally cognizable claim and her case has been dismissed. There is nothing to amend.
In any event, nothing in the Petitioner’s Motions alters the Court’s previous analysis.
SO ORDERED, this 11th day of March, 2013.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

-2-