THOMAS v. HUMPHREY et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 6/27/2013. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION LAMARCUS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN CARL HUMPHREY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-108(MTT) ORDER Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s Order and Recommendation (Doc. 22) on the Plaintiff’s complaints (Docs, 1, 10, 13, 18, and 20). Pursuant to § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge conducted a frivolity review of the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Supplement. 1 The Magistrate Judge recommends that all claims and Defendants be dismissed, with the exception of the Plaintiff’s denial of medical care claims against Defendants Nurse Gore, Doctor Burnside, and Warden Humphrey. (Doc. 22 at 2). The Plaintiff did not object to the Recommendation. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the Plaintiff’s complaint and the Recommendation and the Recommendation is adopted and made an order of this Court. SO ORDERED, this 27th day of June, 2013. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                                                1 The Magistrate Judge reasons that the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Supplement (Doc. 13) most fully explains his claims and that all complaints filed after this Complaint are virtually identical. Further, the Magistrate Judge notes that the later complaints (Docs. 18 and 20) were improperly filed. (Doc. 22 at 1-3). Thus, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the Second Amended Complaint and Supplement in the court’s frivolity review.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?