THOMAS v. HUMPHREY et al
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 22 Report and Recommendations. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 6/27/2013. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
LAMARCUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
WARDEN CARL HUMPHREY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-108(MTT)
ORDER
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle’s Order and
Recommendation (Doc. 22) on the Plaintiff’s complaints (Docs, 1, 10, 13, 18, and 20).
Pursuant to § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge conducted a frivolity review of the Plaintiff’s
Second Amended Complaint and Supplement. 1 The Magistrate Judge recommends
that all claims and Defendants be dismissed, with the exception of the Plaintiff’s denial
of medical care claims against Defendants Nurse Gore, Doctor Burnside, and Warden
Humphrey. (Doc. 22 at 2). The Plaintiff did not object to the Recommendation. The
Court has thoroughly reviewed the Plaintiff’s complaint and the Recommendation and
the Recommendation is adopted and made an order of this Court.
SO ORDERED, this 27th day of June, 2013.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
The Magistrate Judge reasons that the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Supplement (Doc.
13) most fully explains his claims and that all complaints filed after this Complaint are virtually identical.
Further, the Magistrate Judge notes that the later complaints (Docs. 18 and 20) were improperly filed.
(Doc. 22 at 1-3). Thus, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the Second Amended Complaint and Supplement
in the court’s frivolity review.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?