KEY v. HARRINGTON et al
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; and DENYING as futile 22 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Court will delay the entry of judgment to allow Plaintiff to file a motion for reconsideration of this Order. Any such motion shall be filed within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/19/2014. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
LEWIS KEY, JR., a/k/a Samuel Lewis
Key, Jr.,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM CURRY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-134 (MTT)
ORDER
Before the Court is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the motions to
dismiss (Doc. 12; Doc. 16) by Defendants Michelle Cravey, Linda Adams, and William
Currey. The Magistrate Judge further recommends denying as futile the Plaintiff’s
motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 22). The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the
Recommendation.1
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is
ADOPTED and made the ORDER of this Court. The Defendants’ motions to dismiss
are GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint is DENIED as futile.
SO ORDERED, this 19th day of March, 2014.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
The Plaintiff, on March 17, 2014, did submit a motion for an extension of time to file an
objection. (Doc. 26). The magistrate judge denied the Plaintiff’s motion by text order entered
March 18, 2014. However, the Court will delay the entry of judgment to allow Plaintiff to file a
motion for reconsideration of this Order. Any such motion shall be filed within 14 days of the
entry of this Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?