KEY v. HARRINGTON et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss/Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; GRANTING 16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; and DENYING as futile 22 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Court will delay the entry of judgment to allow Plaintiff to file a motion for reconsideration of this Order. Any such motion shall be filed within 14 days of the entry of this Order. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/19/2014. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION LEWIS KEY, JR., a/k/a Samuel Lewis Key, Jr., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CURRY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-134 (MTT) ORDER Before the Court is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the motions to dismiss (Doc. 12; Doc. 16) by Defendants Michelle Cravey, Linda Adams, and William Currey. The Magistrate Judge further recommends denying as futile the Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint (Doc. 22). The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation.1 The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the ORDER of this Court. The Defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint is DENIED as futile. SO ORDERED, this 19th day of March, 2014. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                                                1 The Plaintiff, on March 17, 2014, did submit a motion for an extension of time to file an objection. (Doc. 26). The magistrate judge denied the Plaintiff’s motion by text order entered March 18, 2014. However, the Court will delay the entry of judgment to allow Plaintiff to file a motion for reconsideration of this Order. Any such motion shall be filed within 14 days of the entry of this Order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?