ALLAH v. GRAMIAK et al
ORDER ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 11 Motion to Dismiss. Claims against Defendants Sachdiva, Lewis, Gramiak, and Chaney are dismissed as are the Plaintiff's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief. The Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Tyndal in her individual capacity will go forward. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/3/2014. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ALLAH QUDDOOS ALLAH a/k/a
Warden TOM GRAMIAK, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-186 (MTT)
Before the Court is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen
Hyles. (Doc. 20). The Magistrate Judge recommends the Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendants Sachdiva and Lewis in their individual capacities be dismissed and that his claim
for deliberate indifference against Defendant Tyndal in her individual capacity go forward. He
further recommends that the Plaintiff’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief against all
Defendants be dismissed as moot. Finally, the Magistrate Judge recommends Defendants
Gramiak and Chaney’s motion to dismiss be granted and the claims against them dismissed.
The Plaintiff did not object to the Recommendation.
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, which it ADOPTS and makes the
ORDER of the Court. Claims against Defendants Sachdiva, Lewis, Gramiak, and Chaney
are dismissed as are the Plaintiff’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief. The Plaintiff’s
claim against Defendant Tyndal in her individual capacity will go forward.
SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of March, 2014.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?