ADAMS v. CHAPMAN

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 18 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 14 Motion to Dismiss. A certificate of appelability is DENIED. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/28/2014. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ALLEN ALPHONZO ADAMS, Petitioner, v. Warden BRUCE CHAPMAN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-225 (MTT) ORDER Before the Court is the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 18). The Magistrate Judge recommends granting the Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) because the Petitioner did not file his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition within the one-year period of limitations, failed to establish entitlement to equitable tolling, and failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The Petitioner has filed an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 19). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Petitioner’s objection and made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Petitioner objects. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the ORDER of this Court. Further, the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Therefore, the Respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 28th day of April, 2014. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?