ROBINSON v. OWENS et al
Filing
81
ORDER ADOPTING 77 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 75 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/28/2014. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
JONATHAN ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Commissioner BRIAN OWENS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-292 (MTT)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 77). The Magistrate Judge, having
reviewed the Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, recommends denying the
motion because the Court previously adopted a Recommendation that recommended
dismissing all of the Plaintiff’s claims (Docs. 64, 71). The Plaintiff filed an objection to
the Recommendation. (Doc. 78).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff’s
objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the
Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. Rather than addressing the fact that he
has improperly filed his motion in a closed case, the Plaintiff argues the merits of his
motion. Thus, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and the Recommendation is adopted and
made the order of this Court. The Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Further, the Clerk of
Court is directed to enter final judgment in the above-styled case.
SO ORDERED, this the 28th day of August, 2014.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?