OWENS v. GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 4 Motion for TRO/Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The claims against the GDCP are DISMISSED, and the claims against C.O. John Doe and Inmate John Doe are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 11/5/2013. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION JACKIE DEWAYNE OWENS, Plaintiff, v. GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION PRISON, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-299 (MTT) ORDER Before the Court is the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 8). The Magistrate Judge, having reviewed the Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, recommends dismissing the claims against the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison, C.O. John Doe, and Inmate John Doe. The Magistrate Judge found the Plaintiff cannot properly assert a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the GDCP. Additionally, the Magistrate Judge found the Plaintiff did not sufficiently identify C.O. John Doe to allow service of process, and Inmate John Doe is not subject to suit pursuant to § 1983 because he is not a state actor. The Magistrate Judge also recommends denying the Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 4) because the Plaintiff failed to show this type of extraordinary relief is warranted. The Plaintiff has not objected to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The claims against the GDCP are DISMISSED, and the claims against C.O. John Doe and Inmate John Doe are DISMISSED without prejudice. Further, the Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (Doc. 4) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this the 5th day of November, 2013. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?