DAUGHTRY v. DOE et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Lieutenant Officer X and Officer X are DISMISSED as parties to this action, and the Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Plaintiff's remaining claims shall go forward. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 11/18/2103. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION RICARDO DAUGHTREY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) LT. OFFICER JOHN DOE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-383 (MTT) ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles. (Doc. 5). After screening the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge recommends allowing the Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Deputy Warden of Care and Treatment, Deputy Warden of Security, and Mental Health Director at Baldwin State Prison to go forward. However, the Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Lieutenant Officer X and Officer X because the Plaintiff has not sufficiently identified these Defendants to effect service. The Magistrate Judge also recommends dismissing the Plaintiff’s request for an injunction because that claim became moot upon his transfer to another facility. The Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, Defendants Lieutenant Officer X and Officer X are DISMISSED as parties to this action, and the Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Plaintiff’s remaining claims shall go forward. SO ORDERED, this the 18th day of November, 2013. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?