GHOLSTON v. HUMPHREY et al

Filing 53

ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 24 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/23/2014. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
DEANTE GHOLSTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Warden CARL HUMPHREY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-444 (MTT)

ORDER
Before the Court is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles
H. Weigle. (Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge recommends denying the Plaintiff’s motion
for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 24) because he cannot establish the prerequisites for this
relief.
The Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Recommendation. (Doc. 35). Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff’s objection and made a de novo
determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. At this
time, the Plaintiff has not demonstrated that he is likely to succeed on the merits or that he
will suffer irreparable injury in the absence of injunctive relief.
Consequently, the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the Order of the
Court. The Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of May, 2014.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT