BRANNAN v. OWENS et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING 39 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 38 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; finding as MOOT 30 Report and Recommendations; finding as MOOT 18 Motion to Dismiss; and finding as MOOT 21 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The case is dismissed. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/17/2015. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION ANDREW HOWARD BRANNAN, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner BRIAN OWENS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:13-CV-454 (MTT) ORDER Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles’s Recommendation to grant Defendants Rowles and Thorneloe’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 38) and to dismiss the action as a whole pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1)1 because no motion for substitution was made within 90 days after service of the suggestion of death. (Doc. 39). No objection to the Recommendation has been filed. Because no motion for substitution has been made, the Court agrees the case must be dismissed. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED.2 SO ORDERED, this 17th day of June, 2015. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 2 Rule 25(a)(1) provides: If a party dies and the claim is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed. The pending Recommendation and the motions to dismiss, which the pending Recommendation regards, are moot. (Docs. 18, 21, 30).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?