CASSADY v. HALL

Filing 48

ORDER ADOPTING 45 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 41 Motion to Amend/Correct. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/6/2016. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STEVEN D. HALL, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-CV-25 (MTT) ORDER United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends denying the Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Doc. 41) because “the statute of limitations has expired and the amended complaint does not relate back” pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(c). (Doc. 45 at 5). The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 46). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff’s objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court. The Plaintiff’s motion to amend (Doc. 41) is DENIED as futile. SO ORDERED, this 6th day of January, 2016. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?