CASSADY v. HALL

Filing 97

ORDER ADOPTING 84 Recommendation by Magistrate Judge and DENYING 68 MOTION Garnishment filed by DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/2/2018. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN D. HALL,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-CV-25 (MTT)

ORDER
United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends denying the
Plaintiff’s motion for garnishment (Doc. 68). Doc. 84. The Plaintiff has objected to the
Recommendation. Docs. 85; 94.1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has
considered the Plaintiff’s objections and has made a de novo determination of the
portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed
the Recommendation and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of
the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the
order of this Court, and the motion for garnishment (Doc. 68) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of February, 2018.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1

The Magistrate Judge originally erroneously styled his Recommendation an Order. Doc. 84. The
Plaintiff noticed appeal, and the Eleventh Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the
Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation had not been rendered final by the Court. Docs. 88; 93.