CASSADY v. HALL

Filing 97

ORDER ADOPTING 84 Recommendation by Magistrate Judge and DENYING 68 MOTION Garnishment filed by DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/2/2018. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION DAVID DWAYNE CASSADY, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN D. HALL, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-CV-25 (MTT) ORDER United States Magistrate Judge Stephen Hyles recommends denying the Plaintiff’s motion for garnishment (Doc. 68). Doc. 84. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation. Docs. 85; 94.1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has considered the Plaintiff’s objections and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which the Plaintiff objects. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this Court, and the motion for garnishment (Doc. 68) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of February, 2018. S/ Marc T. Treadwell MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                                              1 The Magistrate Judge originally erroneously styled his Recommendation an Order. Doc. 84. The Plaintiff noticed appeal, and the Eleventh Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation had not been rendered final by the Court. Docs. 88; 93.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?