McMAHON v. HOLT et al
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 25 Report and Recommendations; DENYING as moot 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; DENYING as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. 1 Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/12/2014. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
JEFFERY M. McMAHON,
Plaintiff,
v.
AHMED HOLD, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-CV-51(MTT)
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 25). The Magistrate Judge recommends
dismissing the Plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute because the Plaintiff did not
respond to the Defendants’ motion to dismiss or the Court’s show cause order. The
Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommendation.1
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and the Court accepts and adopts
the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The
Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. Accordingly, the
Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Plaintiff’s motion for
preliminary injunction (Doc. 6) and the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) are
DENIED as moot.
1
The Plaintiff filed a letter with the Court on July 10, 2014 regarding the denial of medical treatment
during sick call on June 23 or 24, 2014 which purports to add an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate
indifference to serious medical needs to his complaint. (Doc. 26). This is not the appropriate procedure
for amending the complaint. Further, the letter is not responsive to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss, the
Court’s show cause order, or the Recommendation.
SO ORDERED, this 12th day of August, 2014.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?