JENKINS v. BUTTS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Filing 6

ORDER: The Plaintiff's complaint, which purports to be an appeal, passes § 1915A frivolity review. Accordingly, the Plaintiff can proceed with her claims against Defendant Butts County School District. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/20/2015. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
PREMESSA JENKINS, by and for
TAMIA JENKINS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BUTTS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-30 (MTT)

ORDER
The Plaintiff alleges Defendant Butts County School District failed to provide her
disabled child, Tamia Jenkins (“T.J.”), with a free and appropriate public education
(FAPE) pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and § 504 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794.1 (Doc. 5 at 6). The Plaintiff also
alleges that the District retaliated against T.J. by “making false reports to the
Department of Family and Children Services” and by “disrob[ing] T.J. to examine her
from head to to[e], [ ] diagramm[ing] any alleged marks, scars and/or injuries, and
further present[ing] those items to the ALJ, making private information readily available
for public consumption, violating the Plaintiffs right to privacy.” (Doc. 5 at 3-4).

1
“To make a claim under section 504 in the education context, something more than an IDEA
violation for failure to provide a FAPE in the least restrictive environment must be shown. A
plaintiff must also demonstrate some bad faith or gross misjudgment by the school or that he
was discriminated against solely because of his disability.” W.C. ex rel. Sue C. v. Cobb Cnty.
Sch. Dist., 407 F. Supp. 2d 1351, 1363-64 (N.D. Ga. 2005).

The Plaintiff first alleged the Defendant failed to provide T.J. with a FAPE in a
suit filed on September 1, 2011. Premessa Jenkins v. Butts County, No. 5:11-cv-350
(MTT). The Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice because she
failed to request a due process hearing pursuant to the administrative requirements of
IDEA. 20 U.S.C. §§ 1415(i)(2)(A), 1415(l). After the Plaintiff filed a pro se due process
complaint against the Defendant, and an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) dismissed
her complaint, the Plaintiff filed another suit with this Court on February 7, 2013.
Premessa Jenkins v. Butts County, No. 5:13-cv-47 (MTT). The Court denied the
Defendant’s motion to dismiss and remanded the Plaintiff’s claims to the ALJ for further
proceedings. See Jenkins, No. 5:13-cv-47 (MTT), Doc. 48.
The Plaintiff alleges that the instant suit is “an appeal” of the February 7, 2013
suit and two cases she filed in the Office of State Administrative Hearings (OSAH).
(Doc. 5 at 1). Along with her complaint, the Plaintiff has submitted a copy of the ALJ’s
January 22, 2015 Final Decision, which denies the Plaintiff’s request for relief under
IDEA. (Doc. 1-1). On April 3, 2015, the Court granted the Plaintiff’s motion to proceed
in forma pauperis. (Doc. 4). However, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to recast her
complaint because she simply instructed the Court to “reference” her February 7, 2013
suit and the two OSAH hearings. (Doc. 4). In response, the Plaintiff has alleged facts
supporting her claims, and thus, the Court can complete its frivolity review. (Doc. 4).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, because the Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis,
the Court is required to dismiss the case if it (1) is frivolous or malicious, (2) fails to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted, or (3) seeks monetary relief against a
defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b). Here, the Court

‐2‐ 

finds that the Plaintiff’s complaint, which purports to be an appeal, passes § 1915A
frivolity review. Accordingly, the Plaintiff can proceed with her claims against Defendant
Butts County School District.
SO ORDERED, this 20th day of April, 2015.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

‐3‐