GUMM v. JACOBS et al
ORDER ADOPTING 100 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 80 Daker's Motion to Intervene. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 9/15/2017. (tlh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
TIMOTHY DENVER GUMM,
Warden BRUCE CHATMAN, et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-41 (MTT)
Waseem Daker has moved to intervene in this case. Doc. 80. United States
Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle recommends denying Daker’s motion because (1)
the PLRA prohibits Daker from using intervention to bypass the “three strikes” provision
of the PLRA; and in the alternative (2) Daker does not have a right to intervene; and (3)
Daker is not entitled to permissive intervention. Doc. 100. The Plaintiff has objected to
the Recommendation. Doc. 101. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has
reviewed Daker’s objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the
Recommendation to which Daker objects. The Court has reviewed the
Recommendation, and the Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation (Doc. 100) is
ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court. Accordingly, Daker’s motion to intervene
(Doc. 80) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED, this 15th day of September, 2017.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?