EMORY v. TAYLOR et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendations. The Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and Speight are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 9/2/2015. (tlh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
MACON DIVISION
DON LEE EMORY, SR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Warden CEDRIC TAYLOR, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15-CV-105 (MTT)

ORDER
Before the Court is the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 5). After screening the Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Magistrate Judge allowed the Eighth Amendment claims against
Defendant Akunwanne to go forward but recommends dismissing the Eighth
Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and Speight. The Plaintiff has not
objected to the Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Recommendation, and
the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the
Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is ADOPTED and made the order of this
Court. Accordingly, the Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Taylor and
Speight are DISMISSED without prejudice.
SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of September, 2015.
S/ Marc T. Treadwell
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT